Systems Archive 3
[ Read Responses | Return to the Index ]
[ Previous | Previous in Thread | Next in Thread | Next ]
My opinion would be no surprise..
Posted by Brh on 21 April 1999, at 8:19 a.m., in response to For Brh - comments wanted, posted by Wiz Kid on 21 April 1999, at 7:46 a.m.
My response to this debate would be predictable Im sure..
My secondary count sims show that HiOpt2, AOII, BrhII amongst others, give lower N0 values when converted to Brh-I rather than Halves or True-SS in 6 and 8 decks. However, I have not done sims with weighted secondary count combinations for different plays, so my PE values are basically that of the primary count.
Nevertheless, for no other reason than betting-insurance induced correlation, I would say that T-Hop-10 would be improved by dropping the '9' from the betting count, at least for shoe games. I would not mess around by calling the '9' -0.5, just call it zero and be done with it.
The Systems Archive 3 is maintained with WebBBS 2.24.060398.