Systems Archive 3
[ Read Responses | Return to the Index ]
[ Previous | Previous in Thread | Next ]
Re: Naming your count system
Posted by Brh on 17 February 2000, at 5:07 p.m., in response to Naming your count system, posted by Ken Fuchs on 16 February 2000, at 12:27 p.m.
I think that is fair enough.
I take pains to explain that Brh-O is not Red-7, and do completely acknowledge that to count every other 7 as +2 (Brh-0-lite) is actually Red-7, and advise the reader to by Blackbelt in Blackjack by Snyder to use as background material. It was through my messing about with Red-7 that I discovered the unbalanced true count, so I make every effort to credit Snyder whenever I can.
You and Olaf invented running count K-O, but I do not really know what the legal situation would be if someone sold a system with K-O tags and true count indices. I sell Brh-0 with true count indices and 'advise' that they can be halved and used for true Red-7, but I still acknowledge that it is Red-7.
You may have another 'situation' arising soon as well. Another player I know has come up with a count which he calls 'Advanced-K-O' or something similar, which is in my opinion more like level-3 Unbalanced Zen (it is an ace compromised Brh-I variant).. I respect the player and I don't want to cause problems, but if you wish him to contact you about the name issue I can email him and let him know if you like.
The Systems Archive 3 is maintained with WebBBS 2.24.060398.