Systems Archive 4
[ Read Responses | Return to the Index ]
[ Previous | Previous in Thread | Next ]
Re: Royal Match Is Good For You But
Posted by Scummie on 1 October 2000, at 2:09 p.m., in response to Royal Match players are good for counters!, posted by Warrior on 20 September 2000, at 6:34 p.m.
I think Royal Match is good for the practiced player, but sometimes the action is too fast for me to take advantage of the things that occur while playing. But I live 5 hours away from the casinos and can't get practice in at home in Silicon Valley.
On may way home, I saw another advantage or two I lost while playing. I had a dealer that kept getting confused when using the indicator lights and I had two tables where the lights were not working. I was frustrated at being exposed to something new while trying to concentrate.
On the way home it hit me. Several time they flipped the cards over but didn't have blackjack. So I had the advantage of hitting till I won or standing against a bad hand. Also, with a ten up and a light that flashed, was that another 10 each time? I wish I was better at thinking on my feet. I bet there was a correlation.
Because people play the side bets and don't tip, my meager tips give me more say at the table with cutting.
I need more practice and am anxious to try Vegas to see if the opportunities are better, the same or worse.
I wish I was a better student, but I figure if it takes me another month or year to get better, I'll get there. Learning in a vacumm without other real students makes it a slower process but I do not trust strangers (could they be casino employees or friends?).
Responses
The Systems Archive 4 is maintained with WebBBS 2.24.060398.