Systems Archive 4

[ Read Responses | Return to the Index ]
[ Previous | Previous in Thread | Next ]


2-D, 3-D

Posted by Cyrus on 13 July 2001, at 10:12 a.m., in response to Decks x System x ROI(nt), posted by T-Hopper on 11 July 2001, at 4:08 p.m.

T-H, your diagram is most welcome. Thanks for the extra effort to have things jump out at the reader through 3-D rendering.

My point was simply that you have two factors, "number of decks" and "system used". The level of penetration is not a factor, it's the same ("good") throughout. The "ROI" is the result and not a factor. The z-axis is not needed, since there's no 3rd factor.

So, the diagram could have been done in 2-D without losing any data. But It does look better and more clearly the way you did it...


Responses


Password:


The Systems Archive 4 is maintained with WebBBS 2.24.060398.