Systems Archive 4

[ Read Responses | Return to the Index ]
[ Previous | Previous in Thread | Next in Thread | Next ]

Re: Blackjack Therapy - Appendix C

Posted by James Bond on 21 January 2002, at 7:45 p.m., in response to Re: Blackjack Therapy - Appendix C, posted by Clarke Cant on 28 December 2001, at 10:59 a.m.

I did a simulation (no CSM - regular shuffle after reaching cut card) on 6 and 8 decks using Uston APC with a cut card at 2 decks and bet variations of 1 to 25 and ended up with .5% player advantage. No insurance.
Do you have player advantage (in %) results for simulation of CSM with a latency of 30% (approx 2 decks for 6 decks) using an advanced count such as Uston APC, assuming very wide bet ranges?

Responses

• No, just not the count I would use and... - Clarke Cant - 22 January 2002, at 10:51 a.m.

The Systems Archive 4 is maintained with WebBBS 2.24.060398.