| | Usually, preferential shuffling in single [and sometimes double] deck is a response by the dealer to an increase in bet size. Sometimes shuffle-up can be induced on a negative count by an increase in bet. However, some casinos have dealers who can count. The most glaring example of this I have observed was at Baldini's 'Sports' Casino in Sparks NV back about a year ago. This casino is not used to anything except nickel action. I came in and started betting some rather mellow quarter action just to cheque the place out. Within about 10 minutes, the regular dealer on my table was replaced by a 5'2" or so Filipina lady with short hair. She shuffled up positives, even with no bet increases, as the floor man watched closely. Needless to say, I left soon thereafter. On the other hand, I have noticed that there are single deck places that will *never* shuffle up. Contrary to many reports I see on the 'net, I have neverexperienced an unstandard procedure at either Binion's Horseshoe or the Horseshoe in Tunica. In other words, they deal:
- 2 rounds to 4, 5, or 6 spots
- 3 rounds to 3 spots
- 4 rounds to 2 spots
all the time, and I believe that following this procedure is one of the dealers' job requirements. I have heard that counters have been flat-betted at Binion's and this is plausible. On the other hand, I have experienced preferential shuffling at several other places. They include:
- Circus Circus LV
- Riviera LV when it had the 1 d S17 game
- Baldini's Sparks, as mentioned above
- Comstock Reno
- Crystal Bay Club North Shore Lake Tahoe
- Colorado Belle Laughlin [a CIR-owned property]
- Primadonna in [former] Stateline
All these reports are old but they correspond with a recent post I have seen reference the Circus Circus game on bj21. It's my feeling that Circus Circus sweats quarter or greater action more than a lot of casinos do. This company strikes me as a casino that wants a house packed with nickel bettors, without having to mess with larger action. Another observation I have made is that preferential shuffling seems to be less common on double deck than on single deck games. Would be curious if any flat-bettors have experienced preferential shuffling at single-deck tables. A typical dealer excuse is, "gee, if I deal another round, I think I'm going to run out of cards." I have experienced preferential shuffling on 6-spot single deck tables with NO bet increase on the second round. It is my impression the dealer usually accomplishes this by the "feel" of the cards in her/his hand rather than by actually counting them. At high + counts, the number of cards remaining in the dealer's hand before the second round is dealt is fewer than the number of cards remaining for the second round at 0 or - counts. This is because the players have hit a lot in the first round owing to the abundance of small cards that round. However, the dealer can hardly run out of cards... because the remaining cards are large and players will need to take few hits! A suggestion to players before they go to play single-deck games is to experiment with a deck of cards. Try dealing yourself 2 rounds to 6 spots and a dealer. Try 3 rounds to 3 spots and 3 rounds to 4 spots. Do it several times for each and write down how many cards you have left after doing this. You will find that it is virtually impossible for the dealer to run out of cards dealing 2 rounds to 6 spots, 3 rounds to 4 spots, 5 rounds to 2 spots and so on. A dealer could run out if they were to deal 3 rounds to 5 spots, which is the reason they only deal 2 rounds [which is terrible penetration]. This post has rambled a little bit, but since preferential shuffling is one of the topics on this board, I wanted to open it up.
|