Open Archive 1

[ Read Responses | Return to the Index ]
[ Previous | Previous in Thread | Next in Thread | Next ]

Red7 vs. KO and a compairson on systems

Posted by Grinder on June 30, 1997 at 13:01:20, in response to Re: Why not know 2 systems..., posted by Pete Moss on June 27, 1997 at 22:34:18

Personally I think KO would be better in wonging a 6 deck game, in fact I'm really impressed with Red7 compared to UBZ11, ZEN Hi-Lo and Hi-Opt I when it come to playing a 6 deck game. My figures "so far" have the following average 1 hour win rates'

Red7/sw16 indice - 148.20
UBZ11            - 135.40
KO               - 113.90
ZEN              - 112.90
Hi-Lo            -  95.90
*Hi-OptI w/o Ace -  85.00

All betting was a 1-8 spread ramping every .5%
1 unit -99 to +.5%
2 units +.51 to 1.0%
4 units +1.01 to 1.5%
8 units +1.51 to +2%
2 hands of 6 above +2%

I realize it's not Kelly but it's realistic.

All systems wonged out approximately 22% of the shoes.

I've been trying for a while to have some simple system beat Red 7 (with extra indices) in a 6+ deck shoe, but either I'm subconsciously bias or ...

In defense to KO, I believe if KO is played like it's written (the wonging at certain deck part) it might beat Red7. I'm surprised at ZEN and UBZ11 didn't beat it. hmmmmmm.

later grinder

Responses

• Re: Red7 vs. KO and a compairson on systems - Pete Moss - July 01, 1997 at 19:10:53
  • Un balanced Zen 11 by George C - Grinder - July 02, 1997 at 13:53:29
• Re: Red7 vs. KO and a compairson on systems - Pete Moss - July 01, 1997 at 19:12:32
  • Re: Red7 vs. KO and a compairson on systems - Grinder - July 02, 1997 at 13:55:15
    • Re: Red7 vs. KO and a compairson on systems - Pete Moss - July 03, 1997 at 00:09:28

The Open Archive 1 is maintained with WebBBS 2.24.060398.