Open Archive 7
[ Read Responses | Return to the Index ]
[ Previous | Previous in Thread | Next in Thread | Next ]
Posted by gehrig on 18 March 2000, at 9:19 p.m., in response to Re: the best blackjack opportunities?, posted by George on 18 March 2000, at 6:59 p.m.
that most decent games/dealers, weak supervision, and temporary promotions get burned out with publicity. local lv players usually find these games for themselves, and they (we) milk them. on publication to any site, free or pay per view, tactless weak-end warriors fly in and instead of carefully squeezing the game, they aggressively spread, index, and get bounced. the game gets gone along with the short timers. i can think of 2 or 3 such games in recent history.
perhaps the only disinterested reporter might be one who already is 86'd everywhere.
in addition, certain sites in the last year or so are casting impedimenta for posters. some might prohibit anonymous posts. that should purify the posts...keep them coming from only the same old suspects. that guarantees that arguably the most valuable posts from casino employees, surveillance agents, are eliminated. other sites might delete, 86, prohibit posts of controversial content or those from controversial posters. these web meisters might resort to vague rationales from excising groups of posts/posters. that size 2 hat agenda further guarantees the "purity", "uniformity" of the messages.
for some reason these same web meisters do not get off their cans and do some field work. sitting at the score board instead of running the bases never got me ahead at anything.
The Open Archive 7 is maintained with WebBBS 2.24.060398.